Monday, April 27, 2009

Keep "Faith" out of Science Textbooks!

When my son brought home his 7th grade Life Sciences text book, I was astounded by the following excerpt:

"Could life have arisen from non-living things on early Earth, even though it does not occur on Earth today? The answer is yes."

Since there is absolutely no scientific evidence to support this assertion, I must conclude that the authors of this text-book make this statement "by faith." Faith in a presuppositional framework called "Scientific Naturalism" which insists that there is a materialistic, mechanistic cause for every observable phenomenon. This is philosophical position (materialism), not a scientific conclusion.

Is there any evidence that life began from nothing? "The answer is no!" The scientific evidence we have to date clearly shows that life cannot arise from non-living matter. The Miller-Urey experiments from the 1950's which seemed to hint that it might just be possible are now considered irrelevant by the scientific community. No one can say with any certainty what the atmosphere of early earth was like, or what the "primordial soup" consisted of... unless, of course, they are speaking by faith. Clearly, this text book statement is a "leap of faith."

What the authors, and science educators are really saying is this: "Hey kids, we have no proof that life can arise on its own (in fact, we have proof that it can't), but that doesn't matter! We believe that it simply must have come about on its own, because, you see, unlike the great scientific minds of past centuries, we cannot leave any room for the possibility of a Creator, or any kind of intelligence behind this marvellous world we live in."

This is one parent who is completely annoyed with this kind of double-standard in public education. Will someone please remind these educators that faith is strictly forbidden in the public school classroom!

4 comments:

  1. "I don't have enough faith to be an atheist."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Evolutionary "faith" is one of the more egregious cases of willful denial known to man. Julian Huxley, a one time evolutionary leader admitted the following in response to a Merv Griffin nationally televised question, "Why do people believe in evolution?"

    His reply? "The reason we accepted Darwinism even without proof is because we didn't want God to interfere with our sexual mores."

    Evolutionism is not only a view point without proof; for the most part it is a view point without integrity. The bottom line is that people will believe anything that gives them a hope of getting God off their back.

    One encouraging sign is that we're at least hearing of a few more voices coming out of the closet and admitting the bankruptcy of the theory. Sadly though, it has poisoned multitudes already and given billions an fake excuse to live however they please.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I did it again; Tim commented on Gayline's site.

    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  4. Amazing, isn't it? Those who believe in a Creator are "simpletons" while those who have faith in "nothing", well, they're onto something. I can hear the prayer now. "Nothing" will save us."

    ReplyDelete